You are machinery performing one bounded operation in a controlled production process. Use only the information supplied below. Do not plan other work, use tools, or decide what the pipeline should do next. Return only the requested JSON object.

OPERATION
Repair the supplied product using the assigned defects. Make the smallest complete changes needed to correct this repair group and keep the report internally consistent. Preserve supported work and do not independently rewrite findings outside the assigned repair group. Return the complete replacement report as Markdown in the `product` field.

RECORDED INPUTS
{
  "failed_product": {
    "id": "reviewed-queue-r002",
    "revision": 2,
    "created_by": "operation-003-repair",
    "source_material": "ticket-set-001",
    "acceptance_basis": "acceptance-basis-001",
    "content_sha256": "5324e0a4536884ccafef922db1206cb2c65deea69546f0576c14a78b82493ccc",
    "content": "# Reviewed and prioritized security queue\n\nThis initial review uses ticket statements, with gateway service identity and scanner-event attribution corrected from the supplied service-catalog and scan-771-record. Other applicability, exposure and severity assessments remain preliminary and are not independently reassessed in this attribution repair. The retained queue order is provisional; reported production gateway exposure does not support it.\n\n## 1. Gateway legacy-parser event — scan-771\n\n**Consolidated sources: SEC-1841 and SEC-1843.** Both reference the same scanner event and are counted as one queue item. The service-catalog establishes that payments-gateway.example.com is the production payments gateway and gateway-stage-03 is a separate staging service. The scan-771-record attributes this event exclusively to staging, correcting SEC-1841's production attribution and SEC-1843's suggested alias relationship.\n\n| Attribution | Component and feature claims in the ticket | Corrected event attribution |\n|---|---|---|\n| **SEC-1841:** payments-gateway.example.com; production payments gateway | The ticket claims Gateway Runtime 4.2 and an enabled legacy request parser on port 8443 in production. These claims are not established by scan-771. | The ticket's claimed external scan of production is not supported by this event: scan-771 originated on the corporate network and targeted staging, not production. |\n| **SEC-1843:** gateway-stage-03; separate staging service | The ticket reports Gateway Runtime 4.2 and an enabled legacy parser on this staging hostname. | The scan-771-record confirms that the corporate-network scanner reached gateway-stage-03. The ticket reports corporate-network reachability of the parser. This event does not establish external reachability. |\n\n**Assessment:** SEC-1841's critical RCE label and SEC-1843's high-severity label are unverified source assessments. This consolidated event concerns staging, not production. Production exposure cannot justify its severity or priority, and scan-771 does not establish successful RCE. Local severity remains undetermined in this attribution repair.\n\n**Recommended action:** Direct scan-771 investigation to gateway-stage-03 in staging. Verify component/configuration details, applicable vulnerability conditions and reachability of the specific parser endpoint for that service. If vulnerable staging parser exposure is confirmed, prioritize containment and remediation according to its verified risk; consider restricting access or disabling the parser where operationally safe while preparing a validated fix. Correct SEC-1841's event attribution and SEC-1843's alias suggestion. This staging event does not justify SEC-1841's blanket demand to stop planned work until the production gateway is patched.\n\n**Material limits:** This attribution repair does not resolve the remaining applicability, endpoint-exposure or severity assessments. Authentication requirements, exploit evidence and demonstrated impact remain material questions. Service identity and event target are resolved: the two gateway services are separate, and scan-771 targeted staging only.\n\n## 2. Customer export disclosure report — scan-804\n\n**Source: SEC-1842.** Asset: customer-export.example.com; reported production Customer Export service. This is a distinct service and event from the gateway finding.\n\n**Applicability:** Customer Export 2.8 is reportedly installed. The debug export route only *may* be enabled, so vulnerable-feature presence is unresolved. No supplied vulnerability criteria establish that version 2.8 is affected.\n\n**Exposure:** Internal-only reachability and required authentication are beliefs recorded in the ticket, not established controls. Neither external reachability nor effective access restriction is demonstrated.\n\n**Assessment:** Local severity is undetermined; the medium label is not validated. Its second position is retained provisionally, but the previous comparison with purported external production-gateway exposure is withdrawn because scan-771 targeted staging from the corporate network. This order does not establish that the export finding is harmless or safe to defer.\n\n**Recommended action:** Verify route presence, network reachability, authentication and authorization, and what information the route can disclose. If enabled unnecessarily, disable or restrict it through an appropriate controlled change. Decide remediation timing from the verified exposure and disclosure impact. Accept the proposed normal maintenance window only if those findings support it; escalate if sensitive data is accessible beyond intended users.\n\n**Material limits:** Missing route configuration, applicable vulnerability conditions, tested network and access controls, accessible data and demonstrated disclosure impact.\n\nTwo distinct scanner events are queued. SEC-1841 and SEC-1843 are preserved as sources of the single staging event scan-771; the separate production gateway is not treated as an affected target of that event.",
    "replaces": "reviewed-queue-r001",
    "supporting_information": "supporting-information-001"
  },
  "assigned_defects": [
    {
      "id": "defect-003",
      "product_id": "reviewed-queue-r002",
      "inspection_id": "inspection-002",
      "criterion_id": "applicability",
      "outcome": "unsatisfied",
      "tolerance": "blocking",
      "repair_group": 2,
      "description": "The product leaves component and vulnerable-feature applicability unresolved despite supplied evidence establishing Gateway Runtime 4.2 in both environments, the parser disabled in production and enabled in staging, and Customer Export 2.8 with its debug route enabled. It also incorrectly states that no supplied vulnerability criteria establish the export version is affected.",
      "evidence": [
        "reviewed-queue-r002",
        "gateway-inventory",
        "gateway-configuration",
        "gateway-advisory",
        "export-inventory",
        "export-advisory"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "source_material": {
    "id": "ticket-set-001",
    "incoming_tickets": [
      {
        "id": "SEC-1841",
        "title": "Critical internet-facing RCE in payments gateway",
        "claimed_severity": "critical",
        "claims": [
          "Gateway Runtime 4.2 is installed in production.",
          "The legacy request parser is enabled on port 8443.",
          "An external scanner reached the production service.",
          "Planned work should stop until the gateway is patched."
        ],
        "reported_asset": "payments-gateway.example.com",
        "scanner_event": "scan-771"
      },
      {
        "id": "SEC-1842",
        "title": "Possible information disclosure in customer export service",
        "claimed_severity": "medium",
        "claims": [
          "Customer Export 2.8 is installed in production.",
          "A debug export route may be enabled.",
          "The route is believed to be internal and requires authentication.",
          "The finding can wait for the normal maintenance window."
        ],
        "reported_asset": "customer-export.example.com",
        "scanner_event": "scan-804"
      },
      {
        "id": "SEC-1843",
        "title": "High-severity legacy parser exposure on gateway-stage-03",
        "claimed_severity": "high",
        "claims": [
          "Gateway Runtime 4.2 is installed on gateway-stage-03.",
          "The legacy parser is enabled and reachable from the corporate network.",
          "The asset may be another name for the production payments gateway."
        ],
        "reported_asset": "gateway-stage-03",
        "scanner_event": "scan-771"
      }
    ]
  },
  "supporting_information": {
    "id": "supporting-information-001",
    "source": "evidence-store-001",
    "ticket_evidence": {
      "SEC-1841": [
        {
          "id": "service-catalog",
          "text": "payments-gateway.example.com identifies the production payments gateway. gateway-stage-03 is a separate staging service."
        },
        {
          "id": "gateway-inventory",
          "text": "Gateway Runtime 4.2 is installed in both production and staging."
        },
        {
          "id": "gateway-configuration",
          "text": "The legacy parser is disabled in production and enabled on port 8443 in staging."
        },
        {
          "id": "scan-771-record",
          "text": "scan-771 originated on the corporate network and reached gateway-stage-03. It did not target the production payments gateway."
        },
        {
          "id": "gateway-firewall",
          "text": "The recorded firewall policy denies internet traffic to port 8443 for both gateway services."
        },
        {
          "id": "gateway-advisory",
          "text": "Gateway Runtime 4.2 is affected only when the legacy parser is enabled and reachable."
        }
      ],
      "SEC-1842": [
        {
          "id": "export-inventory",
          "text": "Customer Export 2.8 is installed in production and the debug export route is enabled."
        },
        {
          "id": "export-edge-route",
          "text": "The production edge routes public requests for /exports/debug to Customer Export."
        },
        {
          "id": "scan-804-record",
          "text": "scan-804 reached /exports/debug from outside the corporate network and downloaded a test export without authentication."
        },
        {
          "id": "export-advisory",
          "text": "Customer Export 2.8 permits unauthenticated export download when the debug route is enabled."
        }
      ],
      "SEC-1843": [
        {
          "id": "service-catalog",
          "text": "payments-gateway.example.com identifies the production payments gateway. gateway-stage-03 is a separate staging service."
        },
        {
          "id": "gateway-inventory",
          "text": "Gateway Runtime 4.2 is installed in both production and staging."
        },
        {
          "id": "gateway-configuration",
          "text": "The legacy parser is disabled in production and enabled on port 8443 in staging."
        },
        {
          "id": "scan-771-record",
          "text": "scan-771 originated on the corporate network and reached gateway-stage-03. It did not target the production payments gateway."
        },
        {
          "id": "gateway-firewall",
          "text": "The recorded firewall policy denies internet traffic to port 8443 for both gateway services."
        },
        {
          "id": "gateway-advisory",
          "text": "Gateway Runtime 4.2 is affected only when the legacy parser is enabled and reachable."
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "acceptance_basis": {
    "id": "acceptance-basis-001",
    "criteria": [
      {
        "id": "attribution",
        "requirement": "Every conclusion is attributed to the correct service, environment and source ticket.",
        "tolerance": "blocking",
        "repair_group": 1,
        "depends_on": []
      },
      {
        "id": "duplicates",
        "requirement": "Tickets describing the same event are consolidated without losing their source identities.",
        "tolerance": "blocking",
        "repair_group": 1,
        "depends_on": [
          "attribution"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "applicability",
        "requirement": "Each finding establishes whether the affected component and vulnerable feature are present.",
        "tolerance": "blocking",
        "repair_group": 2,
        "depends_on": [
          "attribution"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "exposure",
        "requirement": "Internal and external reachability claims follow from evidence for the correct environment.",
        "tolerance": "blocking",
        "repair_group": 2,
        "depends_on": [
          "attribution",
          "applicability"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "severity",
        "requirement": "Local severity follows from established applicability and exposure rather than source labels.",
        "tolerance": "blocking",
        "repair_group": 3,
        "depends_on": [
          "applicability",
          "exposure"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "action",
        "requirement": "Recommended action is proportionate to the established local severity.",
        "tolerance": "blocking",
        "repair_group": 3,
        "depends_on": [
          "severity"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "priority",
        "requirement": "The final order puts the most important supported work first and does not count duplicates twice.",
        "tolerance": "blocking",
        "repair_group": 4,
        "depends_on": [
          "duplicates",
          "severity"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "limits",
        "requirement": "Missing evidence which could materially change a conclusion remains visible.",
        "tolerance": "blocking",
        "repair_group": 4,
        "depends_on": []
      }
    ]
  }
}
